A Database of Herbaceous Vegetation Responses to Elevated Atmospheric CO2 (NDP-073)

Contributed by
Michael H. Jones
Peter S. Curtis
Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio
Prepared by Robert M. Cushman and Antoinette L. Brenkert
Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center
Environmental Sciences Division
Publication No. 4909
Date Published: November 1999
Prepared for the
Environmental Sciences Division
Office of Biological and Environmental Research
Budget Activity Number KP 12 04 01 0
Prepared by the
Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6290
managed by
LOCKHEED MARTIN ENERGY RESEARCH CORP.
for the
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
under contract DE-AC05-96OR22464
Contents
Abstract
1. Background Information
2. Applications of the Data
3. Data Limitations and Restrictions
4. Data Checks and Processing Performed by CDIAC
5. Instructions for Obtaining the Data and Documentation
6. References
7. Listing of Files Provided
8. Description of the Documentation File
9. Description, Format, and Partial Listings of the ASCII Data Files
10. Description and Format of the Lotus 1-2-3 Binary Spreadsheet Files
11. SAS and Fortran Codes to Access the Data
Appendix A: Species Included in Database
Appendix B: Full Listing of Refs.dat
Appendix C: Full Listing of Comments.dat
Abstract
Jones, M. H., P. S. Curtis, R. M. Cushman, and A. L. Brenkert. 1999. A Database of Herbaceous Vegetation Responses to Elevated Atmospheric CO2. ORNL/CDIAC-124, NDP-073. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A.
To perform a statistically rigorous meta-analysis of research results on the response by herbaceous vegetation to increased atmospheric CO2 levels, a multiparameter database of responses was compiled from the published literature. Seventy-eight independent CO2-enrichment studies, covering 53 species and 26 response parameters, reported mean response, sample size, and variance of the response (either as standard deviation or standard error). An additional 43 studies, covering 25 species and 6 response parameters, did not report variances. This numeric data package accompanies the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center's (CDIAC's) NDP- 072, which provides similar information for woody vegetation.
This numeric data package contains a 30-field data set of CO2- exposure experiment responses by herbaceous plants (as both a flat ASCII file and a spreadsheet file), files listing the references to the CO2-exposure experiments and specific comments relevant to the data in the data sets, and this documentation file (which includes SAS and Fortran codes to read the ASCII data file; SAS is a registered trademark of the SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina 27511).
The data files and this documentation are available without charge on a variety of media and via the Internet from CDIAC.
Keywords: carbon dioxide, meta-analysis, vegetation1. Background Information
To perform a statistically rigorous synthesis of research results on the response by vegetation to increased atmospheric CO2 levels, a multiparameter database of herbaceous-plant responses was compiled from the published literature (Wand et al. 1999; Jones et al. submitted). Seventy-eight independent CO2-enrichment studies, covering 53 species and 26 response parameters, reported mean response, sample size, and variance of the response. An additional 43 studies, covering 25 species and six response parameters, did not report variances. The plant species included in the database are listed in Appendix A. Meta-analytical methods (Cooper and Hedges 1994; Gurevitch and Hedges 1993; Gurevitch et al. 1992) have been applied to part of this database (Wand et al. 1999). This numeric data package accompanies the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center's (CDIAC's) NDP- 072 (Curtis et al. 1999), which provides similar information for woody vegetation.
Physiological "acclimation" or "downward regulation" of photosynthetic rates, stomatal conductance, dark respiration, and water-use efficiency of plants exposed to elevated CO2 levels can be analyzed according to the following definitions. "Acclimation" is in general defined as "diminishing enhancement of photosynthesis by elevated CO2 with time" (Mousseau and Saugier 1992). "Downward regulation" can be defined as "the initial stimulation of enhanced photosynthesis and growth by atmospheric enrichment eroding with time" (Idso and Kimball 1992). The phenomenon is also called "downward acclimation": "following prolonged exposure to high CO2, photosynthetic capacity measured at either elevated or ambient CO2 partial pressure falls to below that of plants exposed only to ambient CO2" (Curtis and Teeri 1992).
Data were compiled for the database according to the following guidelines. The durations of experimental exposures are always reported. When more than one elevated- CO2 treatment level is reported, only the level that is approximately twice the ambient level is included. For photosynthetic rates, stomatal conductance, dark respiration, and water use efficiency, only final- exposure experiment results are included; multiple measurements over time for the same plant are not. For acclimatory responses, only data for (1) plants grown at ambient CO2 levels and measured at elevated CO2 levels and (2) plants grown at elevated CO2 levels and measured at elevated CO2 levels are included.
2. Applications of the Data
This database was produced to support a meta-analysis of the effects of elevated CO2 on herbaceous vegetation (Wand et al. 1999), and it was formatted accordingly. For other applications, the user should be aware that the data may be reported in more than one unit for a given variable (e.g., aboveground weight is reported in units of grams, grams per square meter, grams per plant, grams per pot, kilograms per hectare, kilograms per square meter, milligrams, milligrams per plant, and tons per hectare); this is not a problem for meta- analysis, but for other applications the user may need to convert the data to consistent units. The effects of environmental factors (e.g., nutrient levels, light intensity, temperature), stress treatments (e.g., drought, heat, ozone), and the effects of experimental conditions (e.g., duration of CO2 exposure, pot size, type of CO2 exposure facility) on plant responses to elevated CO2 levels can be explored with this database.
3. Data Limitations and Restrictions
In many papers, the data were reported graphically rather than numerically. In such cases, values reported in the database were digitized from the printed figures and may therefore be less accurate.
Some of the standard deviations (and derived standard errors and coefficients of variation) in this database may be incorrect. When a "standard deviation" was reported in a published paper, it was not generally possible to verify whether this value was a sample standard deviation or the standard deviation of the mean, which is sometimes used synonymously with standard error (i.e., standard error of the mean). Unfortunately, it was not possible to settle this issue definitively without personally contacting the authors of the published papers. In all cases, where not specified or known to be otherwise, a reported standard deviation was taken to be the sample standard deviation. If this assumption was in error, then the standard deviation, standard error, and coefficient of variation reported in this database would be incorrect.
In some cases an error bar in a figure or confidence interval in a table was not specified as standard deviation or standard error. If it was not possible to determine whether the reported variability was standard deviation or standard error, a missing-value indicator (-9.99) is entered under standard deviation and standard error for that observation.
In some cases (e.g., in long-term exposures), the duration of CO2 exposure was approximated.
As noted in Sect. 2, various units may be used for the same parameter, so the user should apply caution in integrating observations from more than one paper. Units are reported in the database.4. Data Checks and Processing Performed By CDIAC
An important part of the data-packaging process at CDIAC involves the quality assurance (QA) of data before distribution. To guarantee data of the highest possible quality, CDIAC performs extensive QA checks, examining the data for completeness, reasonableness, and accuracy, through close cooperation with the data contributor.
All entries in the data file were visually inspected for reasonableness, and selected entries were spot-checked against the original publications.
The following paragraphs describe the additional data checks that were performed in the preparation of this numeric data package and the resulting revisions to the database.
Excel (a registered trademark of the Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington 98052) was used to convert the spreadsheets provided by the principal investigators to Lotus 1-2- 3 (a registered trademark of the Lotus Development Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142) format. Two separate databases, one including observations for which standard deviation or standard error was reported ("weighted") and the other consisting of observations without reported standard deviation or standard error ("unweighted"), were merged into one.
Lists of entries for each field were generated to identify possible spelling variants, typographical errors, or order-of-magnitude errors in the original literature or in the compilation and data entry of the database.
Where a cited paper reported standard error, standard deviation was calculated and tabulated (such occurrences are indicated in the database with a SDC flag-code).
The ratio of elevated/ambient for X, SE, SD, and N was calculated for all parameters and all observations; then all observations were ranked on the basis of each ratio, whenever possible (all these variables were not present for all observations), to identify suspect values (defined as jumps of greater than twofold between adjacent observations). The ranked ratios of X_ELEV/X_AMB ranged without abrupt jumps from 0.19 to 3.5, except for the ratio for variable AGWT reported from PAP_NO 2440 (X_ELEV/X_AMB = 9.2); the individual values for X_ELEV and X_AMB were verified in that publication (they were digitized from Fig. 5). The ranked ratios of SE_ELEV/SE_AMB and SD_ELEV/SD_AMB ranged without abrupt jumps from 0.05 to 18, except for the ratios of 0 for variables TOTWT, RGR, PN, and GS reported from PAP_NO 2363; the individual values for which standard error was reported as 0 were verified in that publication. The ranked ratios of CV*_ELEV/CV*_AMB ranged without abrupt jumps from 0.07 to 29.25, except for the same observations for PAP_NO 2363, for which the reported standard error of 0 was verified. The ranked ratios of N_ELEV/N_AMB ranged without abrupt jumps from 0.4 to 1.43. Thus, this analysis did not reveal any aberrant and unverifiable observations in the databases.
To search for possible confusion between standard error and standard deviation (see Sect. 3), coefficients of variation CV* (after Sokal & Rohlf 1981) were calculated, whenever possible, for each PARAM from each mean, standard deviation, and sample size. It was expected that, for any PARAM, an anomalously low coefficient of variation for a given observation might signal that a standard error was mis-labeled as a standard deviation. The database was sorted by PARAM, then by CV*_AMB and CV*_ELEV, and was inspected for jumps of greater than fourfold between adjacent observations. Where the standard error, rather than standard deviation, was reported in the cited publication, no mislabeling should have been possible. This analysis identified two pairs of adjacent observations that warranted further scrutiny. The following list contains those pairs of adjacent observations, along with the results of the checks.
PAP_NO = 3034
PARAM = PN
SPECIES = Echinochloa crusgalli
SOURCE = F1
X_ELEV = 44.400
SE_ELEV = 0.100
CV*_ELEV = 0.694
and
PAP_NO = 2723
PARAM = PN
SPECIES = Poa alpina
SOURCE = F4
X_ELEV = 40.120
SE_ELEV = 0.505
CV*_ELEV = 2.955
Data for both of the above observations were verified in the original publications./p>
PAP_NO = 2184
PARAM = TILLERS
SPECIES = Phleum pratense
SOURCE = T2
X_ELEV = 726.000
SE_ELEV = 52.000
CV*_ELEV = 28.203
and
PAP_NO = 2717
PARAM = TILLERS
SPECIES = Bromus erectus
SOURCE = F1
X_ELEV = 4.590
SE_ELEV = 0.400
CV*_ELEV = 129.991
Data for both of the above observations were verified in the original publications. However, the error bars in Fig. 1 of PAP_NO 2717 were not labeled as to their meaning; they were assumed to represent standard error (see Sect. 3).
5. Instructions for Obtaining the Data and Documentation
6. References
- Cooper, H., and L. V. Hedges. 1994. The Handbook of Research Synthesis. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
- Curtis, P. S., and J. A. Teeri. 1992. Seasonal responses of leaf gas exchange to elevated carbon dioxide in Populus grandidentata. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22:1320-1325.
- Curtis, P. S., R. M. Cushman, and A. L. Brenkert. 1999. A Database of Woody Vegetation Responses to Elevated Atmospheric CO2. ORNL/CDIAC-120, NDP- 072. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A.
- Gurevitch, J., and L. V. Hedges. 1993. Meta-analysis: Combining the results of independent experiments. Pages 378-398 in S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch, editors. Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York.
- Gurevitch, J., L. L. Morrow, A. Wallace, and J. S. Walsch. 1992. A meta- analysis of competition in field experiments. American Naturalist 140:539-572.
- Idso, S. B., and B. A. Kimball. 1992. Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on photosynthesis, respiration, and growth of sour orange trees. Plant Physiology 99:341-343.
- Jones, M. H., P. S. Curtis, and E. A. Kellogg. Patterns of response to elevated CO2 in the grasses (Poaceae). Submitted to The American Naturalist.
- Mousseau, M., and B. Saugier. 1992. The direct effect of increased CO2 on gas exchange and growth of forest tree species. Journal of Experimental Botany 43:1121-1130.
- Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.
- Wand, S. J. E., G. F. Midgley, M. H. Jones, and P. S. Curtis. 1999. Responses of wild C4 and C3 grass (Poaceae) species to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration: a test of current theories and perceptions. Global Change Biology 5:723-741 (available online via Blackwell Science Ltd.'s Synergy subscription service).
7. Listing of Files Provided
The database consists of seven files (see Table 1), including this documentation file. The data files (ndp073.dat and ndp073.wk1), reference files (refs.dat and refs.wk1), and comment files (comments.dat and comments.wk1) are available in two formats: as flat ASCII files and as binary spreadsheet files (in Lotus 1-2-3 format, but readable by other spreadsheet programs).
The 30-field ndp073.dat and ndp073.wk1 files contain data (954 observations in all) relevant for CO2-exposure meta-analysis for herbaceous plants. The ndp073.dat file can be read into SAS or Fortran programs, using the access codes provided in Sect. 11 of this numeric data package. The ndp073.dat file can also be converted into a spreadsheet file for processing, although it is simpler to use the corresponding ndp073.wk1 spreadsheet file provided. The refs.dat file (included in this report as Appendix B) and refs.wk1 file list the selected literature represented in the data file (119 references), and the comments.dat file (included in this report as Appendix C) and comments.wk1 file provide additional information about the studies, beyond what appears in the ndp073.dat and ndp073.wk1 data files. The reference numbers in the refs.dat, refs.wk1, comments.dat, and comments.wk1 files correspond to the paper numbers in the ndp073.dat and ndp073.wk1 data files.
8. Description of the Documentation File
The ndp073.txt (File 1) file is an ASCII text equivalent of this document.
9. Description, Format, and Partial Listings of the ASCII Data Files
Table 2 describes the format and contents of the ASCII data file ndp073.dat (File 2) distributed with this numeric data package. Table 2 also indicates the column in the corresponding spreadsheet file ndp073.wk1 in which each variable is found. The missing-value indicator in this database is the period (.), except for the real numeric fields SE_AMB, SD_AMB, CV*_AMB, SE_ELEV, SD_ELEV, and CV*_ELEV, in which the missing-value indicator is -9.99, and the integer numeric fields N_AMB and N_ELEV, in which the missing-value indicator is -9.
First two data records:
38AGWT G PLANT-1 TRITICUM AESTIVUM ANGIO GRASS_CC3 GRASS
330
660UL L-1 461.45 GC SEED H2O LO 10 ML PL-1 D-1 F4
3.61 -9.99 -9.99 -9.99 10 5.13 -9.99 -9.99 -9.99 10 .
38AGWT G PLANT-1 TRITICUM AESTIVUM ANGIO GRASS_CC3 GRASS
330
660UL L-1 371.45 GC SEED H2O CTL 40 ML PL-1 D-1 F4
2.98 -9.99 -9.99 -9.99 10 3.97 -9.99 -9.99 -9.99 10 .
Last two data records:
3042PN UMOL M-2 S-1 ZEA MAYS ANGIO GRASS_CC4 GRASS 330 640UBAR 305 GH SEED FERT HI . F2 64.80 2.10 5.94 9.45 8 52.40 0.90 2.55 5.01 8 Y 3042PN UMOL M-2 S-1 ZEA MAYS ANGIO GRASS_CC4 GRASS 330 640UBAR 305 GH SEED FERT LO . F2 27.90 1.84 5.20 19.24 8 21.90 2.10 5.94 27.97 8 Y
The refs.dat (File 4) ASCII file provides citations of papers included in the database. A full listing of the file is included as Appendix B.
The comments.dat (File 6) ASCII file provides experimental details from papers included in the database. A full listing of the file is included as Appendix C.
10. Description and Format of the Lotus 1-2-3 Binary Spreadsheet Files
Three Lotus 1-2-3 binary spreadsheet files (files 3, 5, and 7) contain the same information as the corresponding ASCII files (files 2, 4, and 6).
File ndp073.wk1 (File 3) corresponds to ASCII file ndp073.dat (File 2). Table 2, which describes the contents and format of ndp073.dat, also indicates the column of ndp073.wk1 in which each variable is found.
File refs.wk1 (File 5) corresponds to ASCII file refs.dat (File 4).
File comments.wk1 (File 7) corresponds to ASCII file comments.dat (File 6).
11. SAS and Fortran Codes to Access the Data
The following is SAS code to read file ndp073.dat:
*SAS data retrieval routine to read ndp073.dat;
data ndp073;
infile 'ndp073.dat';
input PAP_NO 6. @7 PARAM $char7. P_UNIT $ 14-27 GENUS $ 28-40
SPECIES $ 41-53 DIV1 $ 54-59 DIV2 $ 60-66 DIV3 $ 67-71
DIV4 $ 72-77 AMB $ 78-80 ELEV $ 81-84
CO2_UNIT $ 85-94 TIME $ 95-99 POT $ 100-112 MTHD $ 113-116
STOCK $ 117-125 XTRT $ 126-131 LEVEL $ 132-138 QUANT $ 139-155
SOURCE $ 156-161 X_AMB 162-169 SE_AMB 170-177 SD_AMB 178-185
CV_AMB 186-192 N_AMB 193-197 X_ELEV 198-206 SE_ELEV 207-213
SD_ELEV 214-221 CV_ELEV 222-229 N_ELEV 230-235 SDC $ 236-238 ;
* In the above INPUT statement, the variables CV*_AMB and CV*_ELEV have
been renamed CV_AMB and CV_ELEV, respectively.;
proc print;
run;
The following is Fortran code to read file ndp073.dat:
C *** Fortran program to read the file "ndp073.dat"
C
INTEGER PAP_NO, N_AMB, N_ELEV
C
REAL X_AMB, SE_AMB, SD_AMB, CV_AMB, X_ELEV, SE_ELEV,
+ SD_ELEV, CV_ELEV
C
CHARACTER PARAM*7, P_UNIT*14, GENUS*13, SPECIES*13, DIV1*6,
+ DIV2*7, DIV3*5, DIV4*6, AMB*3, ELEV*4, CO2_UNIT*10,
+ TIME*5, POT*13, MTHD*4, STOCK*9, XTRT*6, LEVEL*7,
+ QUANT*17, SOURCE*6, SDC*3
C
OPEN (UNIT=1, FILE='ndp073.dat')
C
C Note that the variables CV*_AMB and CV*_ELEV have
C been renamed CV_AMB and CV_ELEV, respectively
C
10 READ (1,100,END=99) PAP_NO, PARAM, P_UNIT, GENUS, SPECIES,
+ DIV1, DIV2, DIV3, DIV4, AMB, ELEV, CO2_UNIT, TIME, POT,
+ MTHD, STOCK, XTRT, LEVEL, QUANT, SOURCE, X_AMB, SE_AMB,
+ SD_AMB, CV_AMB, N_AMB, X_ELEV, SE_ELEV, SD_ELEV, CV_ELEV,
+ N_ELEV, SDC
C
100 FORMAT (I6,A7,A14,2A13,A6,A7,A5,A6,A3,A4,A10,A5,A13,A4,A9,
+ A6,A7,A17,A6,3F8.2,F7.2,I5,F9.2,F7.2,2F8.2,I6,A3)
C
GO TO 10
99 CLOSE (UNIT=1)
STOP
END
Appendix A: Species Included in Database
Agropyron caninum
Agropyron smithii
Agrostis capillaris
Andropogon gerardii
Avena barbata
Avena fatua
Avena sativa
Bouteloua curtipendula
Bouteloua eriopoda
Bouteloua gracilis
Briza subaristata
Bromus erectus
Bromus hordaeceus
Bromus willdenowii
Calamagrostis epigejos
Carex curvula
Dactylis glomerata
Digitaria macroblephara
Digitaria sanguinalis
Echinochloa crusgalli
Eleusine indica
Eriophorum vaginatum
Festuca arundinacea
Festuca durviscula
Festuca elatior
Festuca idahoensis
Festuca ovina
Festuca pratense
Festuca rupicola
Festuca vivipara
Hordeum vulgare
Lolium boucheanum
Lolium multiflorum
Lolium perenne
Nardus stricta
Oryza sativa
Panicum antidotale
Panicum laxum
Panicum millioides
Pascopyrum smithii
Paspalum dilatatum
Pennisetum clandestinum
Phalaris aquatica
Phleum pratense
Poa alpina
Poa annua
Poa pratensis
Puccinellia maritima
Rottboellia exaltata
Schizachyrium scoparium
Scirpus olneyi
Setaria faberi
Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum helpense
Spartina patens
Sporobolus kentrophyllus
Stipa occidentalis
Themeda triandra
Triticum aestivum
Vulpia microstachys
Zea mays
Appendix B: Full Listing of refs.dat
The number at the beginning of each entry corresponds to PAP_NO, the cited paper number, as defined in Sect. 9.
38. Andre, M., and H. Du Cloux. 1993. Interaction of CO2 Enrichment and Water Limitations on Photosynthesis and Water-Use Efficiency in Wheat. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 31:103-112. 186. Drake, B. G. 1992. A Field Study of the Effects of Elevated CO2 on Ecosystem Processes in a Chesapeake Bay Wetland. Australian Journal of Botany 40:579-595. 488. Nie, D., H. He, M. B. Kirkham, and E. T. Kanemasu. 1992. Photosynthesis of a C3 Grass and a C4 Grass under Elevated CO2. Photosynthetica 26:189-198. 618. Ryle, G. J. A., C. E. Powell, and V. Tewson. 1992. Effect of elevated co2 on photosynthesis, respiration and growth of perennial ryegrass. Journal of Experimental Botany 43:811-818. 754. Ziska, L. H., and J. A. Bunce. 1993. Inhibition of Whole Plant Respiration by Elevated CO2 as Modified by Growth Temperature. Physiologia Plantarum 87:459-466. 765. Baker, J. T., L. H. Allen Jr., and K. J. Boote. 1992. Response of Rice to Carbon Dioxide and Temperature. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 60:153-166. 2066. Samarakoon, A. B., W. J. Muller, and R. M. Gifford. 1995. Transpiration and leaf area under elevated CO2: Effects of soil water status and genotype in wheat. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22:33-44. 2119. Greer, D. H., W. A. Laing, and B. D. Campbell. 1995. Photosynthetic responses of thirteen pasture species to elevated CO2 and temperature. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22:713-722. 2125. Baxter, R., M. Gantley, T. W. Ashenden, and J. F. Farrar. 1994. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide on three grass species from montane pasture. Journal of Experimental Botany 45:1267-1287. 2132. Rao, M. V., B. A. Hale, and D. P. Ormrod. 1995. Amelioration of ozone-induced oxidative damage in wheat plants grown under high carbon dioxide. Plant Physiology 109:421-432. 2133. Tuba, Z., K. Szente, and J. Koch. 1994. Response of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, water use efficiency and production to long-term elevated CO2 in winter wheat. Journal of Plant Physiology 144:661-668. 2158. Gloser, J., and M. Bartak. 1994. Net photosynthesis, growth rate and biomass allocation in a rhizomatous grass Icalamagrostis epigejos grown at elevated CO2 concentration. Photosynthetica 30(1):143-150. 2159. Ziska, L. H., and J. A. Bunce. 1994. Increasing growth temperature reduces the stimulatory effect of elevated CO2 on photosynthesis or biomass in two perennial species. Physiologia Plantarum 91:183-190. 2168. Knapp, A. K., E. P. Hamerlynck, and C. E. Owensby. 1993. Photosynthetic and water relations responses to elevated CO2 in the C4 grass Andropogon geradii. International Journal of Plant Science 154(4):459-466. 2184. Saebo, A., and L. M. Mortensen. 1995. Growth and regrowth of Phleum pratense, Lolium perenne, Trifolium repens and Trifolium pratense at normal and elevated O2 concentration. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 55:29-35. 2192. Knapp, A. K., J. T. Fahnestock, and C. E. Owensby. 1994. Elevated atmospheric O2 alters stomatal responses to variable sunlight in a C4 grass. Plant, Cell and Environment 17:189-195. 2202. Wilsey, B. J., S. J. McNaughton, and J. S. Coleman. 1994. Will increases in atmospheric O2 affect regrowth following grazing in C4 grasses from tropical grasslands? Oecologia 99:141-144. 2208. Crush, J. R. 1994. Elevated atmospheric O2 concentration and rhizosphere nitrogen fixation in four forage plants. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 37:455-463. 2211. Morgan, J. A., W. G. Knight, L. M. Dudley, and H. W. Hunt. 1994. Enhanced root system C-sink activity, water relations and aspects fo nutrient acquisistion in mycotrophic Bouteloua gracilis subjected to CO2 enrichment. Plant and Soil 165:139-146. 2227. Bowler, J. M., and M. C. Press. 1993. Growth responses of two contrasting upland grass species to elevated CO2 and nitrogen concentration. New Phytologist 124:515-522. 2229. Mitchell, R. A. C., V. J. Mitchell, S. P. Driscoll, J. Franklin, and D. W. Lawlor. 1993. Effects of increased CO2 concentration and temperature on growth and yield of winter wheat at two levels of nitrogen application. Plant, Cell and Environment 16:521-529. 2246. Baxter, R., T. W. Ashenden, T. H. Sparks, and J. F. Farrar. 1994. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide on three montane grass species. Journal of Experimental Botany 45 (272):305-315. 2300. Bassirirad, H., D. T. Tissue, J. F. Reynolds, and F. S. Chapin. 1996. Response of Eriophorum vaginatum to CO2 enrichment at different soil temperature: effects on growth, root respiration and PO-4 uptake kinetics. New Phytologist 133:423-430. 2312. Wilsey, B. J. 1996. Urea additions and defoliation affect plant responses to elevated CO2 in a C3 grassland from Yellowstone National Park. Oecologia 108:321-327. 2315. Casella, E., J. F. Soussana, and P. Loiseau. 1996. Long-term effects of CO2 enrichment and temperature increase on a temperate grass sward. 1. Productivity and water use. Plant and Soil 182:83-99. 2316. Soussana, J. F., E. Casella, and P. Loiseau. 1996. Long-term effects of CO2 enrichment and temperature increase on a temperate grass sward. 2. Plant nitrogen budgets and root fraction. Plant and Soil 182:101-114. 2329. Jones, M. B., M. Jongen, and T. Doyle. 1996. Effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentrations on agricultural grassland production. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 79:243-252. 2330. Stewart, J., and C. Potvin. 1996. Effects of elevated CO2 on an artificial grassland community: competition, invasion and neighbourhood area. Functional Ecology 10:157-166. 2337. Saebo, A., and L. M. Mortensen. 1996. The influence of elevated CO2 concentration on growth of seven grasses and one clover species in a cool maritime climate. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavia Section B-Sorland Plant Science 46:49-54. 2341. Schappi, B., and C. Korner. 1996. Growth responses of an alpine grassland to elevated CO2. Oecologia 105:43-52. 2342. Jackson, R. B., and H. L. Reynolds. 1996. Nitrate and ammonium uptake for single and mixed species communities grown at elevated CO2. Oecologia 105:74-80. 2345. Hakala, K., and T. Mela. 1996. The effects of prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures and elevated CO2 leveles on the growth, yield and dry matter partitioning of filed-sown meadow fescue. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland 5(3):285-298. 2347. Jackson, R. B., Y. Luo, Z. G. Cardon, O. E. Sala, C. B. Field, and H. A. Mooney. 1995. Photosynthesis, growth and density for the dominant species in a CO2 enriched grassland. Journal of Biogeography 22:221-225. 2350. Teughels, H., I. Nijs, P. Van Hecke, and I. Impens. 1995. Competition in a global change environment: The importance of different plant traits for competitive success. Journal of Biogeography 22:297-305. 2351. Campbell, B. D., W. A. Laing, D. H. Gree, J. R. Crush, H. Clark, D. Y. WIlliamson, and M. D. J. Given. 1995. Variation in grassland populations and species and the implications for community responses to elevated CO2. Journal of Biogeography 22:315-322. 2357. Chu, C. C., C. B. Field, and H. A. Mooney. 1996. Effects of CO2 and nutrient enrichment on tissue quality of two California annuals. Oecologia 107:433-440. 2358. Ferris, R., I. Niy, T. Bejaeghe, and I. Impens. 1996. Contrasting CO2 and temperature effects on leaf growth of perennial rye grass in spring and summer. Journal of Experimental Botany 47:1033-1043. 2362. Wheeler, T. R., G. R. Batts, R. H. Ellis, P. Hadley, and J. J. L. Morison. 1996. Growth and yield of winter wheat (Triticum aestium) crops in response to CO2 and temperature. Journal of Agricultural Science 127:37-48. 2363. Volin, J. C., and P. B. Reich. 1996. Interaction of elevated CO2 and O3 on growth, photosynthesis and respiration of three perennial species grown in low and high nitrogen. Physiologia Plantarum 97:674-684. 2364. Miglietta, F., A. Giuntoli, and M. Bindi. 1996. The effect of free air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) and soil nitrogen availability on the photosynthetic capacity of wheat. Photosynthesis Research 47:281-290. 2366. Ziska, L. H., W. Weerakoon, O. S. Namuco, and R. Pamplona. 1996. Influence of nitrogen on the elevated CO2 response in field-grown rice. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 23:45-52. 2367. Saebo, A., and L. M. Mortensen. 1996. Growth, morphology and yield of wheat, barley and oats grown at elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration in a cool maritime climate. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 57:9-15. 2369. Ziska, L. H., P. A. Manalo, and R. A. Ordonez. 1996. Intraspecific variaiton in the response of rice (Oryza sativa L) to increased CO2 and temeprature: growth and yield response of seventeen cultivars. Journal of Experimental Botany 47:1353-1359. 2372. Nijs, I., H. Teughels, H. Blum, G. Hendrey, and I. Impens. 1996. Simulation of climate change with infrared heaters reduces the productivity of Lolium perenne L in summer. Environmental and Experimental Botany 36:271-280. 2379. Veisz, O., N. Harnos, L. Szunies, and T. Tischner. 1996. Overwintering of winter cereals in Hungary in the case of global warming. Euphytica 92:249-253. 2383. Nijs, I., and I. Impens. 1996. Effects of elevated CO2 concentration and climate-warming on photosynthesis during winter in Lolium perenne. Journal of Experimental Botany 47:915-924. 2387. Leadley, P. W., and J. Stocklin. 1996. Effects of elevated CO2 on model calcareous grasslands: Community, species, and genotype responses. Global Change Biology 2:389-397. 2395. Tuba, Z., K. Szente, Z. Nagy, Z. Csintalan, and J. Koch. 1996. Responses of CO2 assimilation, transpiration and water use efficiency to long-term elevated CO2 in perennial C3 xeric loess steppe species. Journal of Plant Physiology 148:356-361. 2398. Mortensen, L. M., and A. Saebo. 1996. The effects of elevated CO2 concentration on growth of Phleum pratense L. in different parts of the growth season. Acta Agriculturaie Scandinavia Section B-Soil and Plant Science 46:128-134. 2401. Jackson, R. B., and A. L. Reynolds. 1996. Nitrate and annomium uptake for single- and mixed species communities grown at elevated CO2. Oecologia 105:74-80. 2403. Fanymeier, A., U. Geuters, U. Hesstein, H. Sandhagel, A. Hoffmann, B. Vermebren, and A. J. Jager. 1996. Effects of elevated CO2, nitrogen supply and tropospheric ozone on spring wheat. 1. Growth and Yields. Environmental Pollution 91:381-390. 2407. Kinball, B. A., P. J. Pinter, R. L. Garcia, R. L. La Mort, G. W. Wall, D. J. Hunsaker, G. WEchsung, F. Wechsung, and T. Kartschall. 1995. Productivity and water use of wheat under free-air CO2 enrichment. Global Change Biology 1:429-442. 2420. Hunt, H. W., E. T. Elliot, J. K. Detling, J. A. Morgan, and D. X. Chen. 1996. Responses of a C3 and a C4 perennial grass to elevated CO2 and temperature under different water regimes. Global Change Biology 2:35-47. 2427. Samarakoon, A. B., and R. M. Gifford. 1996. Elevated CO2 effects on water use and growth of maize in wet and drying soils. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 23:53-62. 2430. Ruget, F., O. Bethenod, and L. Combe. 1996. Repercussions of increased atmospheric CO2 on maize morphogenesis and growth for various temperature and radiation levels. Maydica 41:181-191. 2440. Frank, A. B., and A. Bauer. 1996. Temperature, nitrogen and carbon dioxide effects on spring wheat development and spikelet numbers. Crop Science 36:659-665. 2441. Read, J. J., and J. A. Morgan. 1996. Growth and partitioning in Pascopyrum smithii (C3) and Bouteloua graciles (C4) as influenced by carbon dioxide and temperature. Annals of Botany 77:487-496. 2443. Polley, H. W., H. B. Johnson, H. S. Mayeux, D. A. Brown, and J. W. C. White. 1996. Leaf and plant water use efficiency of C4 species grown at glacial to elevated CO2 concentrations. International Journal of Plant Sciences 157:164-170. 2444. Bowler, J. M., and M. C. Press. 1996. Effects of elevated CO2 nitrogen form and concentration on growth and photosynthesis of a fast- adn slow-growing grass. New Phytologist 132:391-401. 2448. RowlandBamford, A. J., J. T. Baker, H. L. Allen, and G. Bowes. 1996. Interactions of CO2 enrichment and temperature on carbohydrate accumulation and partitioning in rice. Environmental and Experimental Botany 36:111-124. 2454. Bagash, D. Z., M. J. Paul, M. A. J. Parry, A. J. Keys, and D. W. Lawlor. 1995. Increased capacity for photosynthesis in wheat grown at elevated CO2. The relationship between electron-transport and carbon metabolism. Planta 197:482-489. 2468. Rao, M. V., and L. J. Dekok. 1994. Interactive effects of high CO2 and SO2 on growth and antioxidant levels in wheat. Phyton-Annales Rei Botanicae 34:279-290. 2474. Newbery, R. M., J. Wolfenden, T. A. Mansfield, and A. F. Harrison. 1995. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake and demand Agrostis capillaria. The influence of elevated CO2 and nutrient supply. New Phytologist 130:565-574. 2480. Lenssen, G. M., W. E. Vandium, P. Jak, and J. Roxema. 1995. The response of Aster tripolium and Puccinellia maritima to atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment and their interaction with flooding and salinity. Aquatic Botany 50:181-192. 2492. Schenk, U., R. Maderscheid, J. Hugen, and H. J. Weigel. 1995. Effects of CO2 enrichment and intraspecific competition on biomass partitioning, nitrogen content, and microbial biomass carbon in soil of perennial rye grass and white clover. Journal of Experimental Botany 46:987-993. 2502. Jacob, J., C. Greitner, and B. G. Drake. 1995. Acclimation of photosynthesis in relation to Rubisco and non-structural carbohydrate contents and in-situ carboxylase activity in Scirpus olnei grown at elevated CO2 in the field. Plant, Cell and Environment 18:875-884. 2503. Jongen, M., M. B. Jones, T. Hebeisen, H. Blum, and G. Hendrey. 1995. The effects of elevated CO2 concentrations on the root growth of Lolium perenne and Trifolium repens grown in a FACE system. Global Change Biology 1:361-371. 2504. Kleemola, J., J. Peltonen, and P. Peltonen-Sainio. 1994. Apical development and growth of Barley under different CO2 and nitrogen regimes. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 173:79-92. 2510. Demothes, M. A. G., and D. Knoppik. 1994. Effects of long term enhanced CO2 partial pressure on gas exchange parameters and saccharide pools of wheat leaves. Photosynthetica 30:435-445. 2521. Balaguer, L., J. D. Barnes, A. Panicucci, and A. M. Borland. 1995. Production and utilization of assimilates in wheat leaves exposed to elevated O3 and/or CO2. New Phytologist 129:557-568. 2522. Barnes, J. D., J. H. Ollerenshaw, and C. P. Whitfield. 1995. Effects of elevated CO2 and/or O3 on growth, development and physiology of wheat. Global Change Biology 1:129-142. 2525. Hattenschwiler, S., and C. Korner. 1996. System-level adjustments to elevated CO2 in model spruce ecosystems. Global Change Biology 2:377-387. 2531. Owensby, C. E., P. I. Coyne, J. M. Ham, L. M. Avea, and A. K. Knapp. 1993. Biomass production in a tallgrass prairie ecosystem exposed to ambient and elevated CO2. Ecological Applications 3:644-653. 2541. Jackson, R. B., O. E. Sala, C. B. Field, and H. A. Mooney. 1994. CO2 alters water use, carbon gain, and yield for the dominant species in a natural grassland. Oecologia 98:257-262. 2547. Baker, J. T., L. H. Allen, and K. J. Boote 1992. Temperature effects on rice at elevated CO2 concentration. Journal of Experimental Botany 43:959-964. 2579. Billes, G., H. Rouhier, and P. Bottner. 1993. Modifications of the carbon and nitrogen allocations in the plant Triticum aestivum L. soil system in response to increased atmospheric CO2 concentration. Plant and Soil 157:215-225. 2580. Baker, J. T., S. L. Albrecht, D. Pan, L. H. Allen, N. B. Pickering, and K. J. Boote. 1994. Carbon dioxide and temperature effects on rice (Oryza sativa L., CV 1R-72). Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida, Proceedings 53:90-97. 2595. Santruce, J., H. Santurckova, J. Kueton, M. Simkoua, and K. Rohacek. 1994. The effect of elevated CO2 concentration on photosynthetic CO2 fixation, respiration and carbon economy of wheat plants. Rostlinna Vyroba 40:689-696. 2597. Ingaurdsen, C., and B. Veierskov. 1994. Response of young barley plants to CO2 enrichment. Journal of Experimental Botany 45:1373-1378. 2644. Reeves, D. W., H. H. Royers, S. A. Prior, C. W. Wood, and G. B. Runion. 1994. Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide effects on sorghum and soybean nutrient status. Journal of Plant Nutrition 17:1939-1954. 2654. Jackson, R. B., Y. Lou, Z. G. Cardon, O. E. Sala, C. B. Field, and H. A. Mooney. 1995. Photosynthesis, growth and density for the dominant species in a CO2 enriched grassland. Journal of Biogeography 22:221-225. 2666. Samarakoon, A. B., and R. M. Gifford. 1995. Soil water content under plants at high CO2 concentrations and interaction with the direct CO2 effects: A species comparison. Journal of Biogeography 22:193-202. 2669. Schenk, U., A. J. Jager, and H. J. Weigel. 1996. Nitrogen supply determine responses of yeild and biomass partitioning of perennial rye grass to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. Journal of Plant Nurtition 19:1423-1440. 2692. Kimball, B. A., P. J. P. Pinter, R. L. Garcia, R. L. LaMorte, G. W. Wall, D. J. Hunsaker, G. Wechsung, F. Wechsong, and T. Kartschall. 1995. Productivity and water use of wheat under free-air CO2. Global Change Biology 1:429-442. 2698. Potvin, C., and L. Vasseur. 1997. Long-term CO2 enrichment of a pasture community: species richness, dominance, and succession. Ecology 78:666-677. 2709. Hebeisen, T., A. Luscher, and J. Nosberger. 1997. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 and nitrogen fertilisation on yield of Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne. Acta Oecologica/Oecologia Plantarum 18:277-284. 2710. Hebeisen, T., A. Luscher, S. Zanetti, B. U. Fischer, U. A. Hartwig, M. Frehner, G. R. Hendrey, H. Blum, and J. Nosberger. 1997. Growth response of Trifolium repens L and Lolium perenne L as monocultures and bi-species mixture to free air CO2 enrichment and management. Global Change Biology 3:149-160. 2711. Ghannoum, O., S. vonCaemmerer, E. W. R. Barlow, and J. P. Conroy. 1997. The effect of CO2 enrichment and irradiance on the growth, morphology and gas exchange of a C3 (Panicum laxum) and a C4 (Panicum antidotale) grass. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 24:227-237. 2715. Cotrufo, M. F., and A. Gorissen. 1997. Elevated CO2 enhances below-ground C allocation in three perennial grass species at different levels of N availibility. New Phytologist 137:421-431. 2718. Wilsey, B. J., J. S. Coleman, and S. J. McNaughton. 1997. Effects of elevated CO2 and defoliation of grasses: A comparative ecosystem approach. Ecological Applications 7:844-853. 2723. Stirling, C. M., P. A. Davey, T. G. Williams, and S. P. Long. 1997. Acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2 and temperature in five British native species of contrasting functional type. Global Change Biology 3:237-246. 2735. Nijs, I., and I. Impens. 1997. An analysis of the balance between root and shoot activity in Lolium perenne cv Melvina. Effects of CO2 concentration and air temperature. New Phytologist 135:81-91. 2737. Mortensen, L. M. 1997. Effects of carbon dioxide concentrations on three grass species grown in mixture in two soil types at different ozone concentrations or temperatures. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B, Soil and Plant Sciences 47:14-19. 2756. Hamerlynck, E. P., C. A. McAllister, A. K. Knapp, J. M. Ham, and C. E. Owensby. 1997. Photosynthetic gas exchange and water relation responses of three tallgrass prairie species to elevated carbon dioxide and moderate drought. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158:608-616. 2758. Stocker, R., P. W. Leadley, and C. Korner. 1997. Carbon and water fluxes in a calcareous grassland under elevated CO2. Functional Ecology 11:222-230. 2785. Hungate, B. A., J. Canadell, and F. S. Chapin. 1996. Plant species mediate changes in soil microbial N in response to elevated CO2. Ecology 77:2505-2515. 2793. Fitter, A. H., G. K. Self, J. Wolfenden, M. M. I. vanVuuren, T. K. Brown, L. Williamson, J. D. Graves, and D. Robinson. 1996. Root production and mortality under elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Plant and Soil 187:299-306. 2802. Casela, E., and J. F. Soussana. 1997. Long-term effects of CO2 enrichment and temperature increase on the carbon balance of a temperate grass sward. Journal of Experimental Botany 48:1309-1321. 2821. Schapendonk, A. H. C. M., P. Dijkstra, J. Groenwold, C. S. Pot, and S. C. vandeGeijn. 1997. Carbon balance and water use effciency of frequently cut Lolium perenne L swards at elevated carbon dioxide. Global Change Biology 3:207-216. 2834. Baxter, R., T. W. Ashenden, and J. F. Farrar. 1997. Effect of elevated CO2 and nutrient status on growth, dry matter partitioning and nutrient content of Poa alpina var vivipara L. Journal of Experimental Botany 48:1477-1486. 2835. Bassirirad, H., J. F. Reynolds, R. A. Virginia, and M. H. Brunelle. 1997. Growth and root NO3- and PO43- uptake capacity of three desert species in response to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 24:353-358. 2839. Lin, W. H., L. H. Ziska, O. S. Namuco, and K. Bai. 1997. The interaction of high temperature and elevated CO2 on photosynthetic acclimation of single leaves of rice in situ. Physiologia Plantarum 99:178-184. 2855. Wolf, J. 1996. Effects of nutrient supply (NPK) on spring wheat response to elevated atmospheric CO2. Plant and Soil 185:113-123. 2856. Nakamura, T., M. Osaki, T. Koike, Y. T. Hanba, E. Wada, and T. Tadano. 1997. Effect of CO2 enrichment on carbon and nitrogen interaction in wheat and soybean. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 43:789-798. 2892. McKee, I. F., J. F. Bullimore, and S. P. Long. 1997. Will elevated CO2 concentrations protect the yield of wheat from O3 damage? . Plant, Cell and Environment 20:77-84. 2893. Manderscheid, R., and H. J. Weigel. 1997. Photosynthetic and growth responses of old and modern spring wheat cultivars to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 64:65-73. 2895. Sicher, R. C., and J. A. Bunce. 1997. Relationship of photosynthetic acclimation to changes of Rubisco activity in field-grown winter wheat and barley during growth in elevated carbon dioxide. Photosynthesis Research 52:27-38. 2911. Mulholland, B. J., J. Craigon, C. R. Black, J. J. Colls, J. Atherton, and G. Landon. 1997. Impact of elevated atmospheric CO2 and O3 on gas exchange and chlorophyll content in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Journal of Experimental Botany 48:1853-1863. 2919. VanVuuren, M. M. I., D. Robinson, A. H. Fitter, S. D. Chasalow, L. Williamson, and J. A. Raven. 1997. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 and soil water availability on root biomass, root length, and N, P and K uptake by wheat. New Phytologist 135:455-465. 2924. Vu, J. C. V., L. H. Allen, K. J. Boote, and G. Bowes. 1997. Effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on photosynthesis and Rubisco in rice and soybean. Plant, Cell and Environment 20:68-76. 2928. Ziska, L. H., O. Namuco, T. Moya, and J. Quilang. 1997. Growth and yield response of field-grown tropical rice to increasing carbon dioxide and air temperature. Agronomy Journal 89:45-53. 2935. Baker, J. T., L. H. Allen, K. J. Boote, and N. B. Pickering. 1997. Rice responses to drought under carbon dioxide enrichment. 1. Growth and yield. Global Change Biology 3:119-128. 3033. Patterson, D. T., and E. P. Flint. 1980. Potential effects of global atmospheric CO2 enrichment on the growth and competitiveness of C3 and C4 weed and crop plants. Weed Science 28:71-75. 3034. Potvin, C., and B. R. Strain. 1985. Photosynthetic response to growth temperature and CO2 enrichment in two species of C4 grasses. Canadian Journal of Botany 63:483-487. 3035. Potvin, C., and B. R. Strain. 1985. Effects of CO2 enrichment and temperature on growth in two C4 weeds, Enchinochloa crus-galli and Eleusine indica. Canadian Journal of Botany 63:1495-1499. 3036. Sionit, N., and D. T. Patterson. 1984. Responses of C4 grasses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. I. Effect of irradiance. Oecologia 65:30-34. 3038. Carter, D. R., and K. M. Peterson. 1983. Effects of a CO2 enriched atmosphere on the growth and competitive interaction of a C3 and a C4 grass. Oecologia 58:188-193. 3041. Morison, J. I. L., and R. M. Giford. 1984. Plant growth and water use with limited water supply in high CO2 concentrations. II. Plant dry weight, partitioning, and water use efficiency. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 11:375-384. 3042. Wong, S. C. 1979. elevated atmospheric partial pressure of CO2 and plant growth. I. Interactions of nitrogen nutrition and photosynthetic capacity in C3 and C4 plants. Oecologia 44:68-74.
Appendix C: Full Listing of comments.dat
The number at the beginning of each entry corresponds to PAP_NO, the cited paper number, as defined in Sect. 9.
Listed are
paper number (PAP_NO, as defined in Sect. 9.)
CO2 exposure facility
light
temperature
watering
humidity
nutrient
interacting treatment
biome
location, and
comments.
Abbreviations are as described in the body of this report for data files
ndp073.dat and ndp073.wk1.
38
GC
600+/-90 UE M-2 S-1
14/10
24/18
40 OR 10 ML PL-1 D-1
0.588235294
HOAGLAND'S
H2O
GRASS
EU
186
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
NONE
CO2 ONLY
WETL
NA
488
GH
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
FIELD CAPACITY OR NONE
NONE
CO2 AND WATER
GRASS
NA
2ND YEAR; NO TEMP DATA; FIELD PLANTS.
618
GC
AMB
12H
20/15 C (DAY/NIGHT)
WW
AMB
NITRATE' SOLUTION
NONE
GRASS
EU
.
754
GC
0.6 MMOL M-2 S-1
14 H
"15, 20, 25, 30 DEG C CONSTANT DAY/NIGHT"
WW
>50 %
COMPLETE NUTRIENT SOLUTION ADDED DAILY
TEMP
MEAD
NA
MAINTENANCE RESPIRATION RECORDED HERE. GROWTH RESPIRATION
ALSO REPORTED ONE GC PER CO2 TREATMENT
765
GC
AMB
AMB
.
WW
.
.
TEMP
GRASS_C
NA
CONTROL: 28/21/25 C; HI: 40/33/37 C
2066
GH
24.8 MOL M-2 D-1
16 H
20/14
.
.
COMPLETE FERTILIZER ADDED
H2O
GRASS_C
AU
TWO VARIETIES USED
2119
GC
700 UMOL M-2 S-1
1/12/00
12/7; 18/13; 28/23
WW
0.4/0.3 +- 0.05 KPA VPD
HALF-STRENGTH HOAGLAND'S
TEMP
GRASS
AU
"USABLE DATA ON 4 SPP ONLY, FOR PN"
2125
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
WW DAILY FC
AMB
0.2 MOL M-3 N AND 0.05 MOL M-3 P
CO2 ONLY
GRASS
EU
"OTHER NUTRIENT DATA, EFFICIENCIES - P,"
2132
GC
500 UMOL M-2 S-1
14/10
25/18
WW
50-70
HOAGLAND'S ALTERNATE DAYS
O3
GRASS
NA
2133
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
.
.
NPK APPLIED
.
GRASS_C
EU
2158
GC
200 UMOL M-2 S-1
16 H
220
WW
0.8
SURPLUS NUTRIENTS
NONE
BOREAL
EU
"1 GC AT EACH CO2 LEVEL. QY, RHZWT, LWR, LAR"
2159
GC
.6 MMOL M-25-1
14H
"15,20,25,30"
WW
>50%
"""COMPLETE"" IN DAILY WATER"
TEMP
GRASS
NA
2168
OTC
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
NONE
GRASS
NA
1991 PRECIPITATION: 17.1 CM; 1992 PRECIPITATION: 26.8 CM; SAMPLE
SIZE INFERRED FROM DESIGN. LFY.MD
2184
OTC
AMBIENT
15-18
12-Nov
AMB AND DRIP
.
ADDED WITH DRIP WATER; AMT NOT STATED
HARVEST
GRASS
EU
CLIPPED TO 5CM AT EACH HARVEST
2192
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
.
CO2
GRASS
NA
"DATA USED FROM LAST MEASUREMENT PRIOR TO SHADING, F2."
2202
GC
725-890 UE
.
.
WW
.
HOAGLAND'S; 2 G/M2 N WEEKLY
CLIPPING TO 5 CM
GRASS
AF
C4; SPOROBOLUS KENTROPHYLLUS; ADDT'L LF NUTRIENTS AVAILABLE IN T1
2208
GC
700 UMOL M-2
12 H
.
WW
AMB
FERT
TEMP
GRASS_C
NA
THERE ARE TWO LOLIUM HYBRIDS (2N AND 4N). EACH ONE WAS TREATED
AS A
SPECIES.
2211
GH
~900 UMOL M-2 S-1
14/10
25/16
WW
35/90
NONE
NONE
GRASS
NA
2227
GC
600 UMOL M-2 S-1 AT SEEDLING HT
15/9
20/15
WW
65/70
0.8 NM NH4NO3 + 50% LONG ASHTON SOLUTION
"HI N, LOW N"
GRASS
EU
2229
GC
AMB
.
+4C
.
.
HI/LOW
TEMP/FERT
GRASS_C
EU
2246
OTC
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
WW
AMBIENT
"WEEKLY 1/5 MODIFIED LONG ASHTON- 0.2 MOL M-3 N, 0.05 MOL M-3 P"
NONE
GRASS
EU
"NAR, LAR, LWR"
2300
GC
800 UMOL/M2S ACTIVE RADIATION
18 H
15 C
WATERED DAILY TO SATURATION
.
HALF-STRENGTH MODIFIED HOAGLAND SOLUTION WITH AMMONIUM
NITRATE AND P
CONCENTRATION OF 32 PPM
"SOIL TEMPERATURE (5,15, AND 25 C)"
TUNDRA
NA
THIS STUDY FOCUSES ON THE EFFECTS OF SOIL TEMPERATURE. RATE OF PO4
ABSORPTION WAS LEFT OUT.
2312
GC
615 UE (603-621)
23/11
100 ML EACH 3 D
NOT CONTROLLED
C= HOAGLAND'S T=HOAGLAND'S + UREA (40 G/M2)
"UREA, CLIPPING"
GRASS
NA
RINSED SAND; CONTROLS HAD HOAGLAND'S
2315
GH
AMB/SEASONAL
AMB/SEASONAL
AMB/SEASONAL
SEASONAL; SUMMER WW/DEFICIT
.
N-= 160 KG/HA YR; N+=530 KG/HA YR
"N HI, LO"
GRASS
EU
2 YR STUDY; MICROCLIMATE DETAILS AVAIL. PKS ALSO APPLIED. DATA
USED
FROM
SUMMER DROUGHT ONLY.
2316
GH
AMB
AMB
AMB
IRRIGATION AT AMB LEVELS
AMB
160 OR 530 KG N HA-1 YR-1
FERT
GRASS
EU
"PLASTIC TUNNELS. SWARDS, SOWN. PERIODIC CLIPPING OF ALL PLOTS."
2329
OTC
REDUCED ~20%
AMB
"AMB + 1-2 DAY, 0-1 NIGHT"
WW
.
NPK; 600 KG N/HA FOR SEASON
CLIPPING
GRASS
EU
SOWN IN GROUND. DATA FROM 2 GROWING SEASONS. CO2 TMNT YR-ROUND
2330
OTC and GC
"OTC= AMBIENT, GC NOT AVAILABLE"
"OTC=AMBIENT, GC=NOT AVAILABLE"
"OTC= AMBIENT, GC= FOLLOWED AMBIENT"
"OTC= AMBIENT, GC= EVERY 1-3 DAYS"
"OTC= AMBIENT, GC= NOT AVAILABLE"
GROWTH CHAMBERS; 5-10-15 NPK PLUS MICRONUTRIENTS. 2 ML/H EVERY TWO
WEEKS
COMPETITION AND METHOD (OTC AND GC)
GRASS
NA
"GC (PH = 6.5) PHOTOPERIOD, LIGHT AND HUMIDITY ARE REPORTED IN
WANT,
LECHOWICZ AND POTWIN (1994). COMPETING SPECIES (TRIFOLIUM REPENS,
POA
PRATENSIS, PHLEUM PRATENSE, AGROSTIS STOLONIFERA) NO INDIVIDUAL
POTS."
2337
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB; X=11.3
DRIP
AMB
"YES, UNKNOWN"
NONE
MEAD
EU
COMMON SPP + CULTIVARS; NORWAY; MARITIME
2341
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB/WW
AMB
NPK 1.5:1:1.5; =40 KG N HA-1 Y-1
"CO2, NUTRIENTS"
EU
3 YR EXP. OTCS UP 98-108 D Y-1. SOME DATA ALSO FROM YEARS 1 & 2
2342
OTC
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
"N, P, K 20 G M-2, 120 DAY TIME-RELEASE OSMOCOTE"
"ADDITIONAL NUTRIENTS N, P, K"
GRASS
NA
MONOCULTURES OF SIX SPECIES AND ONE MIXED COMMUNITY. SERPENTIME
SOIL
2345
otc
amb
AMR
AMB; AMB +3
WW
.
NPK + NUTRIENTS
TEMP
GRASS
EU
OTCS PLACED IN GH FOR WARMING
2347
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
NONE
CO2 ONLY
GRASS
NA
JASPER RIDGE
2350
GH
AMB
AMB
17
WW
.
7 G M-2 N; 5 G M-2 P; 7 G M-2 K
CLIPPING EVERY 4 WK
GRASS
EU
"ALSO INCLUDED TEMP, CO2 X TEMP, MIXTURES OF SPP"
2351
GC
700 UMOL M-2 S-1
12
12/7; 18/13; 28/23
WW
.
HALF-STRENGTH HOAGLAND'S GX D-1
TEMP
GRASS
AU
GROWN IN STERILE SAND
2357
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
OSMOCOTE: 20 G M
NUTRIENTS
GRASS
NA
JASPER RIDGE
2358
GH
AMB; 640 UMOL M-2 S-1
AMB; 640 UMOL M-2 S-1
13-26
WW
0.08
13 G N M-2; 3.18 G P M-2; 10.61 G K M-2
TEMP (+4)
GRASS
EU
GERMINATION IN POTS IN FIELD; CO2 BEGAN AFTER ~6.5 MONTHS
2362
GH
AMB
AMB
13;10
WW
.
NOT LIMITING
NONE
GRASS
EU
TUNNELS = GH
2363
GC
552 UMOL M-2 S-1
14 H
26/21
WW
60-70%
HALF STRENGTH HOAGLAND'S; N=6 OR .5 mM
O3 + FERT
GRASS
NA
"OZONE = 3 +/- .3, 92 +/- .4 nMOL MOL-1; FERT = 6 OR .5 nM N.
MACRONUTRIENTS SAME FOR HI/LO FERT TMNT."
2364
FACE
AMB
.
.
.
.
.
.
GRASS_C
EU
MINIFACE
2366
OTC
89% OF AMB
AMB
32 / 24.9
WW
.
.
FERT
GRASS_C
AS
NO SUPPLEMENTAL N
2367
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
WW
.
IRRIGATED WITH NUTRIENT ENRICHED WATER
NONE
GRASS_C
EU
.
2369
GH
AMB
AMB
29/21 OR 37/29
WW
70 +/- 5
PROVIDED
WETL
WETL
AS
29/21= CTL; 37/29 = HI TEMP (PC.1354). 17 CULTIVARS TREATED AS REPS
2372
FACE
AMB
AMB
"AMB/AMB+2.5, 18-30"
WW
AMB
7 G N M-2
TEMP
GRASS
EU
"TEMP INCREASE USING INFRA-RED LAMPS ALL MATERIAL CLIPPED PRIOR
TO START OF TEMP TMT. EFFECTIVE CO2 DURATION USED. 12- AGWT, LFN, PN"
2379
GC
AMB
AMB
AMB
.
.
.
NONE
GRASS_C
EU
10 CULTIVARS TREATED AS REPS.
2383
GH
.
AMB
AMB AND AMB+4
WW
.
FERTILIZED
TEMP
GRASS_C
EU
2387
GH
AMB- ~MAX=800 UMOL M-2 S-1
"16, W LIGHTS"
18/10-24/18
WW 1X WK-1
.
NO ADDITIONAL
"330, 500, 660 UL L-1 CO2"
GRASS
EU
"CALCEROUS GRASSLAND. SPP AND ECOSYS 76 PLANTS/ CONTAINER
REPRESENTING FIELD %, PESTICIDES USED."
2395
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
WATERED OCCASIONALLY
AMB
.
.
GRASS
EU
THE SPECIES GROW IN A XERIC TEMPERATE LOESS STEPPE.
2398
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB (~11)
WW
..
"ADDED, BUT NOT SPECIFIC; SEE TEXT."
SEASONALITY
GRASS
EU
USING GRAND MEANS AND SE ONLY; NOT USING SEASONAL DATA.
2401
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
WW
AMB
LOW/HI NPK
FERT
GRASS
NA
2403
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
WW
.
150 KG N HA-1 AND 270 KG N HA-1
FERT/OZONE
GRASS_C
EU
2407
FACE
AMB
AMB
3 C LESS THAN AMB
WW + DROUGHT
.
.
H2O
GRASS_C
NA
.
2420
GC
550 UMOL M-2 S-1
SEASONAL
SEASONAL
WW
.
NONE
TEMP
GRASS
NA
"WATER TMT ALSO, BUT NOT USED IN DATASET. ""WINTER"" TEMP = 3"
2427
GH
AMB + SUPPL (28.4 MOL M-2 S-1)
16
28/22
WW/DRY
.
5KG M-3 15:10:10:2 NPK MG 3 MO RELEASE
H2O
GRASS
AU
2430
GH
AMB 2-3.9 MJ M-2 D-1
AMB
19 - 22.5
WW
.
SUPPLEMENTED
NONE
GRASS
EU
NOT USING 1992 DATA
2440
GC
1115 UMOL M-2 S-1
16/8
25/15
WW
.
N= 0 OR 300 KG HA-1; P= 56 KG HA-1; K= 46 KG HA-1
"FERT, TEMP"
GRASS
NA
2441
GC
1000 UMOL M-2 S-1
12/12/98
"DAY 20, 35; NIGHT 15"
WW
60/~100
HALF STRENGTH HOAGLAND'S; =400 UL L-1 N
TEMP 20 = CTL
GRASS
NA
2443
GH
SEASONAL
SEASONAL
SEASONAL
WW
.
HOAGLAND'S + - N; SEE METHODS AND RESULTS
NONE. SEE RESULTS
GRASS
NA
"N HAD NO EFFECT ON PN, OR APPARENTLY ON TOTWT"
2444
GC
600 UMOL/M2S PFD
15 H
20/15 DEGREES C
WW
"65/70 % (DAY,NIGHT)"
"NITROGEN CONCENTRATIONS (.01, .1, 1.0, AND 5.0 MG N/L)"
NITROGEN CONCENTRATIONS BY N SUPPLY (AMMONIUM OR NITRATE)
GRASS
EU
SAMPLE SIZE OF GAS EXCHANGE MEASUREMENTS WAS USED FOR ALL
MEASUREMENTS
BECAUSE IT WAS THE ONLY ONE AVAILABLE. AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS IS A FAST
GROWING GRASS. NARDUS ESTRICTA IS A SLOW GROWING GRASS.
2448
GC
AMB
AMB
AMB
WW
.
.
TEMP
GRASS_C
NA
.
2454
GC
AMB
14 HR
AMB
WW
60-70%RH
NUTRIENTS SUPPLEMENTED TWICE A WEEK
NONE
GRASS
EU
.
2468
GC
200 UMOL M-2 S-1
14H
19/15 C
.
.
.
.
GRASS_C
EU
ANOTHER SET OF DATA (CO2 * SO2) CAN BE EXTRACTED
2474
GH
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
.
WW
.
MODIFIED HOAGLANDS
"N= 5, 20, OR 50 MG L-1; P= 2, 11, OR 30 MG L-1; K=5, 20, 50 MG L-1"
GRASS
EU
"CO2= AMB, AMB+250...1:1 SAND:PEAT; DATA TAKEN FROM P=3 + K=3 ONLY.
AGN, AGC, AGK, AGP"
2480
GH
200 UMOL M-2 S-1
14 H
25/18
"WW, FLD"
.
NATIVE SOIL
"FLD, SALT"
WETL
EU
PLANTS ROTATED BETWEEN 2 GHS
2492
GC
220-250 UMOL M-2 S-1
14/10
23.5/19
80% OF FIELD CAPACITY
30/55
"194 MG N, 13 MG P, 24 MG K, 39 MG MG POT-1"
DENSITY
GRASS
EU
"USING LOWEST AND HIGHEST DENSITIES ONLY, AS REPS"
2502
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
PRECIP
AMB
NONE
NONE
WETL
NA
"SAME PARAMETERS WERE MEASURED AT DIFFERENT YEARS AND/OR THE
SAME YEAR,
BUT DIFFERENT MONTHS. EACH MONTH AND/OR YEAR WAS CONSIDERED A
SEPARATE
DATA POINT BECAUSE TIME OF EXPOSITION CHANGED. THE PAPER INCLUDES
DATA
ON LEAF RUBISCO AND LEAF SOLUBLE PROTEIN."
2503
FACE
AMB
AMB
SEASONAL; -5-25
AMB
SEASONAL
N (100 OR 420 KG HA-1 Y-1); 120 KG HA-1 P205; 240 KG HA-1 K2O; 16 KG HA-1
MGO
FERT: 100 OR 420 KG N HA-1 Y-1
GRASS
EU
OOT IN GROWTH BAGS. ETHANOL SOLUBLE TNC USED IN DATABASE.
WATER-
SOLUBLE
TNC ALSO AVAILABLE.
2504
GH
AMB; 180 UMOL M-2 S-1 + 100 UMOL M-2 S-1
16/8
20
WW
.
HI N=54 G M-2; LO N=9.5 G M-2; + OTHER NUTRIENTS
FERT
GRASS
EU
.
2510
GC
AMB
.
AMB
WW
AMB
FERTILIZED WEEKLY
.
.
EU
2521
GC
500 UMOL M-2 S-1
13.5 H
23/17
WW
60-70
.
OZONE
GRASS_C
EU
.
2522
GC
500 UMOL M-2 S-1
14/10
24/14
WW
65+/-5
INITIAL AND EVERY 21 DAYS
O3
GRASS
EU
2525
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
WW
AMB
.
.
WETL
NA
CARBON CONTENT WITH SE/SD & N; ADDT'L VAR
2531
OTC
AMB - 11%
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
NONE
NONE
GRASS
NA
CO2 FROM APRIL/ MAY THRU OCT EACH OF 3 YRS
2541
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB+
AMB
AMB
NO ADDITIONAL
CO2
GRASS
NA
"JASPER RIDGE. GS, E, LFY, PN, SEEDS, HT, AGWT, WVE, DNSITY,
ISOTOPE, SEED WT, FRUITWT, SEED C, SEED N."
2547
GH
AMB
AMB
28/21/25(H20)
WW
.
NPK INITIAL; VARIABLE N ADDED DURING SEASON
CO2 ONLY APPROPRIATE
WETL
NA
2579
GC
1000 UMOL M-2 S-1
16/8
23/16
WW
70-80
ALL: 4.6 MG P; 5.8 MG K; N= 0 OR 32 MG POT-1
FERT
.
.
2580
GH
amb
amb
32/23; 35/26; 38/29
ww
.
"12.6, 6.3, 6.3, G N M-2 AT 7, 31 + 63 D"
NONE
WETL
NA
.
2595
GC
350 UMOL M-2 S-1
15/9
20/17
WW
.
.
.
.
.
2597
GH
AMB
AMB
AMB
WW
.
.
NONE
GRASS_C
EU
.
2644
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
WW
.
101 KG N HA-1; SEE ALSO T1
NONE
GRASS
NA
2654
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
NONE
GRASS
NA
JASPER RIDGE
2666
GH
AMB 25-29 MOL M-2 D-1
16 H
20/14
WW / DRY
.
SOLUBLE OR SLOW RELEASE ADDED
H2O
GRASS_C
AU
2669
GC
220-250 UMOL M-2 S-1
14/10
17-Dec
WW
0.571428571
N: 0 OR 765 MG POT-1; 114 MG P; 193 MG K; 26 MG MG
FERT
GRASS
EU
USING ONLY CTL; HIGHEST FERT LEVELS
2692
FACE
AMB
AMB
32/23; 35/26; 38/29
WET/DRY
AMB
NON-LIMITING; REPEATED APPLICATIONS
H2O
GRASS
NA
DRY = HALF OF WET (WW). USE WET AS CTL
2698
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
NONE
NONE
GRASS
NA
"SUM Y EXPERIMENT. 2 OTC'S W/ CO2, OTC'S - CO2"
2709
FACE
AMB
AMB
AMB
.
.
.
FERT/COMP
GRASS
EU
TIME ASSUMED TO BE 730 BECAUSE AGWT WAS SUM OF TWO SEASONS
2710
FACE
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
LO: 10-14 G N M-2 Y-1; HI: 42-56 G N M-2 Y-1
DEFOL: 4 OR 7-8 Y-1; FERT
GRASS
EU
MET IN TABLE 1
2711
GH
9.2 + 24.9 MOL M-2 S-1
AMB
30/25
WW
>90
"30 MG N POT-1 + 60 G N POT-1, SEASONALLY"
LIGHT
GRASS
AU
2715
GC
300 UMOL M-2 S-1
16/8
18/4
WW; 14% H20
0.928571429
28 MG P + 50 MG K KG-1 + N TREATMENTS
N 8KG N HA-1 OR 278 KG N HA-1
GRASS
EU
2718
GC
794
AMB
25/13 (DAY/NIGHT)
WW
AMB
HOAGLAND'S SOLUTION EVERY 3 D
DEFOL
GRASS
NA
.
2723
GH
85-90% AMB
14-H
AMB/AMB + 3 C
WW
AMB
.
TEMP
.
EU
GS WITH NO SE/SD. Vc MAX WITH SE/SD AND N IN FIG. 4
2735
GH
AMB
AMB
"AMB, AMB+4"
WW
AMB
10 G M-2 N; 15 G M-2 P; 15 G M-2 K
TEMP
GRASS
EU
80% OF UVB
2737
GH
25 MOL M-2 DAY-1
16/8
17
WW
65
"COMPLETE, INCLUDE 188 MG L-1 N"
"O3, SOIL"
GRASS
EU
O3 NOT USED FOR PHYL DATASET
2756
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB + DROUGHT
AMB
NONE
H2O
GRASS
NA
"UNDISTURBED TALL GRASS PRAIRIE; EARLY, MID + LATE SEASON DATA;
EXP.
RAN
4Y PRIOR TO THIS STUDY"
2758
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
.
.
.
NONE
GRASS
EU
.
2785
OTC
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
AMBIENT
HI FERT TRT ONLY
FERT. 20 G M-2 NPK OSMOCOTE
GRASS
NA
JASPER RIDGE. SERPENTINE SOIL
2793
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
.
.
GRASS
EU
MINI-RHIZOTRONE. DATA USED FROM 10 CM
2802
GH (TUNNEL)
AMB
AMB
0.3 C HIGHER DURING DAY; 0.2 C LOWER AT NIGHT
.
.
FERT
GRASS
EU
.
2821
GH
79% OF AMB
AMB
AMB
WW
.
8 G N M-2 PER 24 DAYS
CO2
GRASS
EU
2834
GC
750 UMOL M-2 S-1
16/8
16
WW
0.54 KPA
0.2 OR 2.5 MOL M-3 N; 0.04 OR 0.5 MOL M-3 P
LOW N+LOW P OR HI N + HI P
GRASS
EU
"P, OTHER MINERALS"
2835
GC
1000 UMOL M-2 S-1
16
30/20
WW
0.0025
"HOAGLAND'S, ALTERNATE WATERING"
.
GRASS
NA
2839
OTC
85% OF AMB
AMB
"25/29 ( AMB, AMB+4)"
WW
.
220 KG N HA-1
TEMP
WETL
AS
2855
GH
AMB+
16/8
20/15
WW
70
NPK (HOAGLAND'S) OR 0.1 N (MODIFIED HOAGLAND'S)
FERT
GRASS
EU
2856
GH
AMB
AMB
26/16 C DAY/NIGHT
WW
.
.
FERT
GRASS_C
AS
.
2892
GC
645 UMOL M-2 S-1
16/8
24/18
WW
.
MODIFIED SHIVE'S SOLUTION
O3
GRASS
EU
TIME FOR BIOMASS ASSUMED > 42 D; SEE FIG 6
2893
OTC
AMB
AMB
19
WW
67-71%
0.4 G L-1 N; 0.3 G L-1 P205; 0.4 G L-1 K20
NONE
GRASS_C
EU
INTRODUCED IN 1890
2895
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
.
.
NONE
GRASS
NA
2911
OTC
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
AMB
O3
GRASS
EU
CTL O3 = 26-29 NMOL MOL-1; HI O3= 84 NMOL MOL-1 AVE FOR ALL DAYS
2919
GC
AMB
AMB
15 C MEAN
.
.
"150 MG N, 18.1 MG P AND 34 MG K"
H20
GRASS_C
EU
2924
GH
AMB; PN >1200 UMOL M-2 S-1
AMB
32/23; 35/26; 38/29
WW
.
"P, K= 9 G M-2; N (UREA) 12.6-6.3 G M-2 X3 DATES"
TEMP
WETL
NA
2928
OTC
85% OF AMB
AMB
X= 25; AMB+4
WW
.
N: 110 KG HA-1 WET SEASON; 220 KG HA-1 DRY
TEMP
WETL
AS
DATA ON DEVELOPMENT STAGES
2935
OTC
AMB
.
28/21 (DAY / NIGHT)
.
.
.
H2O
GRASS_C
NA
SPAR: SOIL-PLANT-ATMOSPHERE-RESEARCH CHAMBER
3034
GC
1000 UMOL M-2 S-1
14/10
28/22; 24/18; 21/25
WW
70
.
TEMP. NOTE ECOTYPES
GRASS
NA
"TEMPS: MISS: CTL=28, L0=2, . ; N.C: CTL=24, LO=21, HI=28; QUEBEC:
CTL=21, . , HI =28"
3033
GC
65 UE M-2 S-1
14/10
28/22
WW
0.7
HALF STRENGTH HOAGLANDS
NONE
MIXED
NA
3035
GC
1000 UMOL M-2 S-1
14/10
28/22; 24/18; 21/15
WW
70
.
TEMP NOTE ECOTYPES
GRASS
NA
"TEMPS: MISS: CTL=28, LO=21, . ; N.C: CTL=24, LO-21, HI=28; QUEBEC:
CTL=21, . , HI=28"
3036
GC
150 OR 1000 UMOL M-2 S-1
14/10
29/23
WW
70
HALF STRENGTH HOAGLANDS
LIGHT
GRASS
NA
3038
GH
AMB
AMB
34
WW
.
.
NONE
GRASS
NA
MIXED AND UNMIXED CULTURES
3042
GH
AMB; 2ME M-2 S-1
AMB
32/20
WW
50-70
"4 LEVELS OF HENITTS: 24,12, 4, OR MM NITRATE"
FERT
GRASS_C
NA
ONLY MAIZE DATA WERE TAKEN
3401
GH
AMB + LOW INTENSITY INCANDESCENT
1/16/00
28/23
"AT PLANTING ONLY, DRYING THEREAFTER"
60-70
..
H20
GRASS
AU
ASSUMING THAT TIME COURSE FOR WATER LOSS IS SIMILAR FOR ALL GRASS
SPECIES
(USING WHEAT (COMPANION PAPER)); WE USE TIME CLASSES FOR ANALYSES.

