3c. Determination of pCO2 in Discrete Seawater Samples:

A fully automated equilibrator-gas chromatograph system was used during the expedition for the determination of partial pressure of CO2 exerted by the seawater samples, and its design has been described by Chipman et al. (1993). Fig. 4 gives a schematic diagram of this system.

The system consists of a pair of air circulation pumps (Spectrex Model AS-300-SS) plumbed to recirculate air through porous plastic gas dispersers which are immersed in two separate seawater samples. Electrically driven Valco 4-port valves were used to isolate each of the equilibrators during the initial equilibration prior to analysis of the equilibrated air. Manually operated 2-way and 3-way Whitey valves allowed part of the water in each equilibrator to be replaced with air of known initial CO2 concentration, to create the necessary headspace for equilibration. A drain line in each equilibrator insured that the ratio of water to air in each equilibrator was constant, allowing accurate corrections to be made for the effect of the perturbation of the sample seawater by the headspace air. Diaphragms (thin rubber balloons) were plumbed to each equilibrator to provide "soft walls" to the system, so that the pressure in the equilibrators was kept close to the ambient laboratory atmospheric pressure, which was measured with a high precision electronic barometer. Since the partial pressure of CO2 is strongly affected by temperature changes, the equilibration flasks were kept immersed in a constant temperature water bath. A constant bath temperature of 4 °C was used during the expedition. An electrically driven Valco 6-port valve allowed the entire equilibration system to be isolated, simultaneously connecting a calibration gas selection valve (an electrically driven Valco, Model 4SD, with 4 input ports and 8-position driver). A 2-way normally-closed Skinner solenoid valve on the output of the calibration selection valve allowed the gas flows to be controlled by the system controller, and provided a necessary second means of stopping the flow of the calibration gases to prevent the accidental loss of calibration gases in the event of control malfunction.

The analysis of the CO2 in the equilibrated air or calibration gases was performed using a Shimadzu Mini-2 gas chromatograph, which was equipped with a flame ionization detector. A one-ml sample loop and a pre-column and analytical column (both packed with Chromosorb 102, of 0.2 and 2.0 m lengths respectively) were attached to an electrically driven Valco 10-port valve within the column oven of the gas chromatograph. Ultra-high purity hydrogen gas (electrolytically generated by an Aadco hydrogen generator and purified by means of diffusion through a palladium foil using an Aadco hydrogen purifier) served as the carrier gas for the chromatographic separation of CO2 from the other components of the air. The use of hydrogen as a carrier gas also allowed the CO2 to be converted to methane in an attached catalytic converter prior to quantification by the flame ionization detector. Unlike the method described by Weiss (1981), our system used a catalyst of ruthenium metal on Chromosorb W support and did not require a palladium pre-catalyst to remove oxygen from the carrier gas stream. Hydrocarbon-free air to support the combustion in the flame ionization detector was provided by means of a chromatographic air purifier (Aadco Model 737).

Integration of the output signal from the gas chromatograph and control of the entire equilibration and calibration procedure was provided by means of a Shimadzu Chromatopac (Model C-R6A) computing integrator.

The analytical procedure is as follows. Water samples for analysis were drawn from the 10-liter Niskin bottles of a rosette cast directly into 500-ml narrow-necked volumetric Pyrex flasks which served both as sample containers and equilibration vessels. The samples were poisoned with 200 µl of 50% saturated mercuric chloride solution to prevent biological modification of the pCO2, and were stored in the dark until measurement, which normally was performed within 24 hours of sampling. A headspace of 3 to 5 ml was left above the water in the flask to allow for thermal expansion during storage. The flasks were sealed air-tight using screw-caps with conical plastic liners. Prior to analysis, the sample flasks were brought to the water bath temperature (either 4.0°C or 20.0°C in the constant temperature bath, and about 45 ml of water is displaced with air of known CO2 concentration. The air in the flasks and in the tubing connecting the flasks to the gas chromatograph sampling loop was recirculated continuously for about 20 minutes through the gas disperser immersed in the water. This provided large surface contact areas for gas exchange between the sample water and the recirculating air, and equilibrium for CO2 between these two phases was attained in 15 minutes.

The equilibrated air samples taken from the headspace of the flasks were saturated with water-vapor at the temperature of equilibration and had the same pCO2 as the water sample. By injecting the air aliquot without removal of the water vapor, the partial pressure of CO2 was determined directly using the relationship below (Takahashi et al., 1982):

pCO2 (µatm) = [Cmeas (ppm)]*[Total pressure of equilibration (atm)],

where Cmeas is the mole fraction concentration of CO2 in equilibrated moist air. The total pressure of the equilibrated air was measured by having the head space in the equilibrator flask always at atmospheric pressure which was, in turn, measured with an electronic barometer at the time each equilibrated air sample was injected into the gas chromatograph. Since water vapor was not removed from the sample, it is not needed to know the water vapor pressure.

Corrections were made to account for the change in pCO2 of the sample water due to the transfer of CO2 to or from the water during equilibration with the recirculating air. The analytical steps yielding Cmeas, which have been programmed in the on-line computer, are schematically shown in Fig. 5-A; the pCO2 correction routines in Fig. 5-B; and a list of variables in Fig. 5-C. The precision of the pCO2 measurement for a single hydrographic station (i.e., for an order of a day) has been estimated to be about ±0.15% based on the reproducibility of replicate equilibrations. However, the station-to-station reproducibility has been about ±0.5%.


CDIAC   |  CCSI   |  ESD   |   ORNL   |   Security   |   Contact Us   |   maintained by Alex Kozyr   |   Last modified: 16 Jun 2010